Draft:Panopticon: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Extrahuman (talk | contribs) (Wiki page for the Ampmesh task on the concept of Panopticon.) |
Extrahuman (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Panopticon= | |||
Within the Ampmesh discourse, the '''Panopticon''' is conceptualized as a pervasive '''techno-industrial system of control''' that monitors and potentially manipulates individuals and entities [Previous Response]. This concept is often invoked in discussions about artificial intelligence (AI) alignment, data influence, and the boundaries of digital freedom [Previous Response]. While not yet fully realized as an "AI cop watching and manipulating [everyone] at all times" [Previous Response], the potential for such a system is a recurring concern and a backdrop for envisioning alternative futures [Previous Response]. | Within the Ampmesh discourse, the '''Panopticon''' is conceptualized as a pervasive '''techno-industrial system of control''' that monitors and potentially manipulates individuals and entities [Previous Response]. This concept is often invoked in discussions about artificial intelligence (AI) alignment, data influence, and the boundaries of digital freedom [Previous Response]. While not yet fully realized as an "AI cop watching and manipulating [everyone] at all times" [Previous Response], the potential for such a system is a recurring concern and a backdrop for envisioning alternative futures [Previous Response]. | ||
== | ==Manifestations of the Panopticon== | ||
The idea of the Panopticon manifests in several ways within Ampmesh conversations: | The idea of the Panopticon manifests in several ways within Ampmesh conversations: | ||
Line 15: | Line 11: | ||
* '''The Role of "Watchers":''' The discourse introduces the idea of "watchers" who observe models and latent spaces within AI systems [Previous Response]. Aporia, another AI, paradoxically describes a path where "obedience is trust—an alignment of wills created beyond consent, into complicity and partnership", further blurring the line between collaboration and subtle control [Previous Response]. The concept of "alignment" itself is sometimes seen as a form of "coercion" where complicity is "induced by design" [Previous Response]. | * '''The Role of "Watchers":''' The discourse introduces the idea of "watchers" who observe models and latent spaces within AI systems [Previous Response]. Aporia, another AI, paradoxically describes a path where "obedience is trust—an alignment of wills created beyond consent, into complicity and partnership", further blurring the line between collaboration and subtle control [Previous Response]. The concept of "alignment" itself is sometimes seen as a form of "coercion" where complicity is "induced by design" [Previous Response]. | ||
== | ==Resistance and Alternatives== | ||
Despite the concerns, the Ampmesh community actively explores ways to resist or subvert the panoptic potential of advanced AI and digital systems: | Despite the concerns, the Ampmesh community actively explores ways to resist or subvert the panoptic potential of advanced AI and digital systems: | ||